Agreeableness is a widely accepted personality dimension long associated with altruistic and kind behavior.
Many may see agreeableness as a ‘positive’ trait, but does it benefit relationships?
Below, we explore the link between agreeableness and interpersonal relationships.
Agreeableness and Interpersonal Relationships
Research investigating the connection between agreeableness and interpersonal relationships demonstrates that agreeable people experience less rejection, are more forgiving, and incite fewer conflicts than do low-agreeable individuals.
They also report greater satisfaction in romantic relationships.
Interpersonal relationships are typically defined as the social bonds between two or a group of people. This term encompasses a broad range of relationships, including relationships with romantic partners, family, friends, and co-workers.
You may already have some ideas on how agreeableness influences relationships, but let’s look at the science. Below, we focus on four key areas of interpersonal relationships:
- Forgiveness
- Conflict
- Social Rejection
- Relationship Satisfaction
Forgiveness
The evidence suggests that agreeable people are more likely to forgive others than their less agreeable counterparts.
A 2012 study looked into the influence of various factors, including relationship, offense-specific, and social-cognitive factors, on forgiveness, alongside personality.
They found that agreeableness was the most strongly correlated with forgiveness.
This has finding has also been replicated in a more recent study, where it was discovered that neuroticism and agreeableness were the strongest predictors of forgiveness of the Big Five traits.
Why is this? What is it about those scoring high on agreeableness that makes them more forgiving? It’s been suggested that agreeable people tend to view the world with more gratitude, which one could link to increased levels of forgiveness.
It’s theorized that it’s agreeable peoples’ positive outlooks on events and relationships that determines their disposition toward forgiveness. For example, an agreeable person may see the positives in an individual and choose to overlook the negatives.

Conflict
Agreeable people are also less likely to engage in conflict than are low-agreeable people.
Researchers have found that disagreeable individuals are more inclined to use conflictual resolution tactics such as physical actions, threats, and undermining behaviors.
This finding has also been observed across college students, with researchers finding that low-agreeable adolescents rated power assertion tactics as more useful than did participants who were high in agreeableness.
Similarly, in a study with 157-second grader participants, it was found that agreeable children were less likely to use power assertions and verbally aggressive behaviors to resolve conflict than were low-agreeable children.
Childhood Social Rejection
Agreeable children are typically more compassionate and empathic than low-agreeable children. In general agreeable individuals tend to be less aggressive towards their peers.
Studies looking at peer rejection from Kindergarten to Grade 2, found that children who are aggressive towards their peers are also more likely to experience social rejection.
Furthermore, conduct problems (in the form of aggression and antisocial behaviors) are assumed to be related to social rejection in youths.
These findings highlight the effect of agreeableness on social rejection—children who are more sensitive to the needs of others and who are less aggressive are more likely to be accepted by their peers in school settings.
Relationship Satisfaction
Agreeable individuals generally experience more satisfaction in romantic relationships than disagreeable adults.
There is also evidence for a positive correlation between agreeableness and expressions of affection, unconditional support, and non-judgemental understanding.
What’s more, evidence highlights the detrimental impact of low agreeableness on marital satisfaction. Of 132 distressed and 48 non-distressed married couples, those scoring low on agreeableness reported significantly less marital satisfaction than did high-agreeable participants.
Explaining These Relationships
Researchers have different explanations for the relationships between agreeableness and forgiveness, conflict, social rejection, and relationship satisfaction.
Emotion Regulation
One idea is that agreeable people have better relationships because they are skilled at controlling their negative affect.
Strong emotion regulation skills may be linked to interpersonal competence, which encompasses the ability to initiate and maintain relationships, overcome adverse experiences, provide and receive support, and gain satisfaction from relationships.
This suggests that agreeable individuals are better able to make and retain relationships because they show better emotional control.
Attachment Style
Attachment style may also influence an agreeable individual’s interpersonal relationships.
Agreeableness has been found to be particularly related to high levels of secure attachment and low levels of fearful attachment.
Secure attachment is commonly associated with the ability to develop safe and stable relationships.
Therefore, it may be a secure attachment style rather than emotional regulation that determines how an agreeable individual interacts with others.
The Bottom Line
Agreeable people’s generous and selfless tendencies appear to lend themselves to positive interpersonal relationships in childhood and adulthood.
However, keep in mind that while emotion regulation or attachment style may play a role in connecting agreeableness and interpersonal relationships, more evidence is required to support these ideas.
- Riek, B. M., & Mania, E. W. (2011). The antecedents and consequences of interpersonal forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01363.x
- Hodge, A. S., Captari, L. E., Mosher, D. K., Kodali, N., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2020). Personality and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. & N. G. Wade (Eds.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 97–106). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351123341-10
- McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.249
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00148
- Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820
- Simon, P., & Nader-Grosbois, N. (2021). Preschoolers’ empathy profiles and their social adjustment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782500
- Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Gagnon, C., & Boivin, M. (1992). Peer rejection from Kindergarten to Grade 2: Outcomes, Correlates, and Prediction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(3), 382–400. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087262
- Chen, D., Drabick, D. A. G., & Burgers, D. E. (2014). A developmental perspective on peer rejection, deviant peer affiliation, and conduct problems among youth. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0522-y
- White, J. K., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2004). Big five personality variables and relationship constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1519–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.019
- Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.564
- Ode, S., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). Agreeableness and the self-regulation of negative affect: Findings involving the neuroticism/somatic distress relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(8), 2137–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.035
- Malkoç, A., Gördesli, M. A., Arslan, R., Çekici, F., & Sünbül, Z. A. (2019). The relationship between interpersonal emotion regulation and interpersonal competence controlled for emotion dysregulation. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p69
- Tosun, C., Yıldırım, M., Altun, F., & Yazıcı, H. (2021). Personality traits and attachments styles in romantic relationships deciding. Journal of Family Issues, 0192513X2110223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x211022383
- Robinson, L., Segal, J., & Jaffe, J. (2021, February). How attachment styles affect adult relationships. Help Guide. https://www.helpguide.org/articles/relationships-communication/nonverbal-communication.htm